Portfolio magazine folds - This post from TechCrunch makes some great points about print media and the competition with web-based media.
4.27.2009
Today's catchy stuff from the web
Verizon + Apple = new iPhone-ish device - Looks like Verizon and Apple are in talks to partner with some kind of Verizon/Apple hardware similar to an iPhone.
4.26.2009
New DJ mix posted (house and techno)
I just posted a new house/techno mix that I recorded in haste last night at Jake's place. Feel free to download and listen here. Let me know what you think...
4.24.2009
Photo hosting sites compared
Since I went through this debate recently, and since one of my friends is going through it now, I decided to take a crack at comparing some of the internet's photo hosting/sharing sites. I'll begin by saying that when I went through this a few months ago, I decided on Picasa (Google), mostly because I'm already a Google freak and therefore I can seamlessly intergrate my photos into my blog, email, etc. without using multiple logins. Also, Picasa lets me save/share full resolution images (which is something Kodak Gallery wasn't allowing me to do). I ended up paying Google $20 for a year and 10 gigs of storage. Since I shoot RAW images that are about 8mb each, I'm going to run over the 10 gb soon, and will probably have to upgrade my storage package. The ONLY downside that I've encountered with Picasa is that it won't store RAW images - it converts them to jpeg.
So with that being said, I came up with a comparison spreadsheet containing all the features I think are important. Feel free to comment with anything I should add, correct, or consider.
4.23.2009
Today's catchy stuff from the web
Polaris Adobe AIR Application - Lets you run your Google Analytics numbers on your desktop. And, this is important...it seems to run in real-time...(NICE!)
Tweet your home energy use - Haha, how's that for geeky?
Sweet Juniper - Pretty cool Detroit blog about a couple raising their kids.
Woopra - Real-time analytics
Cold Fusion - Is cold fusion on the horizon?
4.22.2009
Today's catchy stuff from the web
Maureen Dowd on Twitter (New York Times)
Shrinking Flint (New York Times)
Professional Blogging #1 (Read Write Web)
Professional Blogging #2 (Wall Street Journal)
Six Ways You Should Be Using Twitter (Lifehacker)
High Speed Rail (U.S. Dept. of Transportation - Federal Railroad Administration)
4.20.2009
Things that I like / don't like
Like: Mass Transit
Lately there has been lots of talk about using stimulus funds to build regional high speed rail networks. Thank goodness...after visiting Germany last year, I'm a believer.
Don't like: Dress codes/Long lines at bars/Suited doormen
Alright seriously...this is Lansing, and in Lansing there just isn't any need for this...ANY of this. I don't mean that as a knock on Lansing, I just mean that I kinda like Lansing's unpretentious character. Besides, cool bars are cool and trendy not because they have a dress code, long lines, or suited doormen, but because they attract people who are cool...If your bar isn't attracting the clientèle you're aiming for, then do something different, like charging a bigger cover, or playing better music, or having a better atmosphere.
Like: Free online newspaper content
The Associated Press wants a piece of Google's (and Yahoo's) ad revenue from its content - the AP doesn't like news aggregators to score advertising revenue off the free content it gleans from the web. So that's cool, I understand...just don't start charging consumers for the content and taking away the "freeness" of it, and I (and everyone else) will be happy. If Google and Yahoo wants to sells their ads, then let them pay the royalties, and keep it free for the consumer.
Don't like: Voicemail
See my post here.
Like: Turntables (analog/vinyl)
Real DJ's learned on turntables...with vinyl records. Techno was invented in Detroit, and those guys spin on vinyl. Nothing looks cooler than a set of tec 12's and a dude (or girl) jockeying about, throwing 12" vinyl around. And the sound is incredible.
Don't like: Turntables (digital/cd)
Real DJ's learned on turntables...with vinyl records. They may not use them anymore, but at least they can. I met a guy last summer who was apparently a local club DJ in Detroit. Jake and I had turntables set up, and we offered him a spin...except he didn't know how...since he had learned using digital decks, he couldn't figure out how the whole vinyl thing worked...
Like: Linux
The nerd's operating system. I haven't reached nerd status (as far as computers go), but I'm trying. Linux is free, there are a ton of different versions, and it does most anything that Windows does. Also, it's open source, so everyone in the world has the opportunity to make it better.
Don't like: Windows
Expensive, unreliable, resource hog. And it's made by Microsoft. Need I say more?
Accessible from anywhere. Cheap. Reliable. If your hard drive crashes, it really doesn't matter.
Don't like: Local storage
Unless your machine is networked, the data is only accessible from your desktop - which means you've got to lug your machine around. If your hard drive crashes or your gear is stolen, then your stuff is gone.
4.18.2009
March/April Photography
UPDATE: Lansing Meal Deals
Per some suggestions from friends, I just updated the "Lansing Meal Deals" site. Enjoy!
4.14.2009
How do you communicate?
Today I was reading an article/interview in Businessweek about Research In Motion (RIM), the makers of BlackBerry mobile devices. Basically, what I gleaned from the article (and what everyone seems to know already) is that the Apple iPhone seems to be the smartphone that every communication device maker tries to emulate. The iPhone has enjoyed enormous success - remarkable, since it's only supported by one wireless carrier (AT&T) and the BlackBerry is supported by several. I started wondering: why isn't RIM more of a competitor?
I realized that the whole idea of a BlackBerry revolves around mobile email access, and that the devices really aren't much more useful than a bare-bones wireless device. In fact, I recently discovered an application that essentially turned my bare-bones wireless phone into an email machine - it even alerts me when I have email - much like a BlackBerry.
So what's the problem?
I realized I hardly ever send email anymore. In fact, in the past week I've sent exactly 18 emails. Of those, five of them were to myself (I tend to use email when I need to remind myself of something to do later).
So in the past week, I've used email 13 times to communicate with other people. This got me thinking about my communication habits, and my curiosity got the best of me: in the same week I've sent 124 text messages, and used my phone 20 times to call people. I estimate that in the same time, I've posted 15 updates on Twitter, and the same on Facebook. I've probably used Facebook another 20-30 times to communicate directly with people.
I realized that in the age of Facebook, Twitter, and widespread wireless integration, it's possible that email and traditional voice calls have been largely replaced by more flexible, more interactive, or even more simple forms of communication. Twitter allows us to update or call out to people on a massive scale. Facebook allows us to be interactive - to use photos, songs, or event invitations to communicate. Texting allows us to get in touch with people on the fly.
So what's this mean? What it means to me is that if other people's communication habits are anything like my own, then the BlackBerry isn't really a competitor to the iPhone. The iPhone is designed to run applications - if you visit the iPhone App Store, you can find an application for just about anything, including email. The difference between the iPhone and the BlackBerry is that one device is marketed to those who use email, and one device is marketed to those who want flexibility in what their phone will do.
Only recently has RIM figured out what Apple has known for a long time, and they've opened their own application store: BlackBerry App World. I'm sure this will bring RIM more in step with what consumers want and need these days, but what about the bigger question: how are people's communications needs changing? What are the trends? Who are going to be the innovators who accurately predict how people will communicate in the future? Is this the end of communication innovation, or is something new going to evolve that takes us beyond the smartphone? And how will the effectiveness of our communications evolve or suffer as a byproduct of using the technology? (see concerns expressed in the anonymous comment in my voicemail post)
What do you think? What are your communication habits?
I realized that the whole idea of a BlackBerry revolves around mobile email access, and that the devices really aren't much more useful than a bare-bones wireless device. In fact, I recently discovered an application that essentially turned my bare-bones wireless phone into an email machine - it even alerts me when I have email - much like a BlackBerry.
So what's the problem?
I realized I hardly ever send email anymore. In fact, in the past week I've sent exactly 18 emails. Of those, five of them were to myself (I tend to use email when I need to remind myself of something to do later).
So in the past week, I've used email 13 times to communicate with other people. This got me thinking about my communication habits, and my curiosity got the best of me: in the same week I've sent 124 text messages, and used my phone 20 times to call people. I estimate that in the same time, I've posted 15 updates on Twitter, and the same on Facebook. I've probably used Facebook another 20-30 times to communicate directly with people.
I realized that in the age of Facebook, Twitter, and widespread wireless integration, it's possible that email and traditional voice calls have been largely replaced by more flexible, more interactive, or even more simple forms of communication. Twitter allows us to update or call out to people on a massive scale. Facebook allows us to be interactive - to use photos, songs, or event invitations to communicate. Texting allows us to get in touch with people on the fly.
So what's this mean? What it means to me is that if other people's communication habits are anything like my own, then the BlackBerry isn't really a competitor to the iPhone. The iPhone is designed to run applications - if you visit the iPhone App Store, you can find an application for just about anything, including email. The difference between the iPhone and the BlackBerry is that one device is marketed to those who use email, and one device is marketed to those who want flexibility in what their phone will do.
Only recently has RIM figured out what Apple has known for a long time, and they've opened their own application store: BlackBerry App World. I'm sure this will bring RIM more in step with what consumers want and need these days, but what about the bigger question: how are people's communications needs changing? What are the trends? Who are going to be the innovators who accurately predict how people will communicate in the future? Is this the end of communication innovation, or is something new going to evolve that takes us beyond the smartphone? And how will the effectiveness of our communications evolve or suffer as a byproduct of using the technology? (see concerns expressed in the anonymous comment in my voicemail post)
What do you think? What are your communication habits?
Labels:
Apple,
BlackBerry,
Communication,
Email,
Facebook,
iPhone,
RIM,
Smartphone,
Twitter
4.07.2009
Death to voicemail
Today I ran across an article in the NY Times, which questioned the relevance of voicemail in the age of text messaging, email, and social networking.
I couldn't agree more - the continued use of voicemail should be questioned.
For months, I've been asking friends and family to quit leaving me voicemail...I've spent way too much time dialing the voicemail number, punching in my password, and listening to long, drawn-out messages about why I need to call someone back, when I should call them back, and what we need to talk about when I do call them back.
"Please leave a detailed message with your name, phone number, and the time that you called..."
Hahaha, are you serious???
Hahaha, are you serious???
Not only that, but I have to sift through ALL of the previous voicemails people have left (often they're new, because I refuse to take the time to check them), so that by the time I do go through my voicemail, it's at least a 15-minute process.
Case in point: This past weekend I was in downtown Detroit for the MSU basketball game v. UConn. The venue was loud, people were everywhere, lots of screaming and cheering, etc. - but somehow, friends managed to leave me at least two voicemails - the crazy thing was, these people were in the SAME building I was in, and to think that they actually thought I could hear their voicemail is somewhat hilarious...
Sending a text message is a whole lot easier...and quite frankly, 99 times out of 100 the caller ID suffices.
So here it is: I propose we all drop voicemail and get with the times - text message or no message will save us all a lot of wasted time and frustration.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)